Web 2.0
Web 2.0 - The new weapon on the Web
"Web 2.0" is often associated with web development and web design that allows for interactive information sharing, interoperability, user-center design and collaboration on the World Wide Web. Examples of Web 2.0 include on-line communities, hosted services, web applications, social networks, video-sharing sites, wikis, blogs, mashups and folksonomies. Web 2.0 site allows its users to communicate with other users, or to change the content of Web sites, unlike non-interactive website on which users are just passive viewing of the information provided to them.
The term is closely connected with Tim O'Reilly because O'Reilly Media Web 2.0 conference in 2004. Although the term suggests a new version of the World Wide Web, but does not refer to an update to any technical specifications, but the cumulative changes in the way developers and end users use the web. Whether Web 2.0, is qualitatively different from previous Web technologies has been challenged by World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee, who called the term "piece of jargon"
History
The term "Web 2.0" was created by Darcy DiNucci in 1999. In his article "Fragmented Future," writes
This network now know that loads the browser window, essentially static screenfuls is the only seed to lose on the internet. The first glimmerings from the perspective of Web 2.0 come, and we are just starting as an embryo can not develop the Web be considered not as screenfuls text and graphics, but as a transport mechanism, ether, which takes place interactivity.
Her use of the term is mainly concerned with web design and aesthetics, she argues that the web is "fragmented" due to the widespread use of portable devices, Web-ready. The article is aimed at designers, and reminds them that the code for a growing range of hardware. As such, its use of the word suggests - but not directly - the current use of the term.
The term does not resurface until 2003. These authors focus on concepts that are related to the concept, which, as Scott Dietz says: "The Internet is a universal standard on-integration platform.
In 2004 began a period of rising popularity, when O'Reilly Media and Media Live is the first Web 2.0 conference. In his opening speech outlining John Batelle and Tim O'Reilly, the definition of "Web as Platform," where software is built on the site, as opposed to the desktop. A unique aspect of this migration, claimed that "customers build your business for you." They argued that the business users create content (in the form of ideas, text, video or images), could be "used" to create value. According to Tim O'Reilly:
Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the shift to the Internet as a platform and attempt to understand the rules for success on the new platform.
From there the term Web 2.0, largely supported by technology bloggers and journalists, which culminated in the 2006 TIME magazine Person of the Year - "You." TIME is selected by the masses of users who participated in creating content on social networks, blogs, wikis, and media sharing sites. Cover story writer Lev Grossman explains:
It is a story about community and cooperation at the level never seen before. It's about the cosmic compendium of knowledge Wikipedia and the million-channel people's network YouTube and MySpace online metropolis. It's a lot to wrest power from the few and helping one another for nothing and not only how it will change the world, but also change the way the world is changing.
Features
Flickr, Web 2.0 site that allows users to upload and share photos
Web 2.0 websites allow users to do more than just receive information. Can build on the interactive installation "Web 1.0" to provide "Network as platform" computing, allowing users to run software-applications entirely through a browser. Users can own data in a Web 2.0 site and exercise control over the data. These web sites may be "architecture of participation" that encourages users to add value to the program to be employed. This is in contrast to traditional web pages, ordering limited visitors to viewing and whose content only the site owner can change. Web 2.0 sites are often rich and user-friendly interface based on Ajax and similar frames, client-side interactivity, or full client-server application frameworks, such as OpenLaszlo, Flex, and ZK framework .
The concept of Web-as-participation-platform captures many of these characteristics. Decreti Bart, founder and former CEO of Flock, calls Web 2.0 "participatory Web" , and for the web-as-information-source as Web 1.0.
The impossibility of excluding group-members who contribute to the provision of goods from sharing profits gives rise to the possibility that rational members prefer to withhold their contribution of effort and free-ride on the contributions of others. [15] This requires a so-called radical leadership Trust Web site. According to Best, [16] that characterize Web 2.0 are: rich user experience, user participation, dynamic content, metadata, web standards and scalability. Other features, such as openness, freedom and collective intelligence [18], through interaction with the user, can be viewed as essential attributes of Web 2.0.
Technology overview
Web 2.0 combines the skills and client-server-side software, content syndication and the use of network protocols. Standards-orienterte nettlesere kan bruk og Programvare plugins utvidelser for å håndtere innholdet og brukerinteraksjon. Web 2.0 sites provide users with information storage, creation and expansion of capacity, which could not be in the village now known as "Web 1.0".
Web 2.0 websites typically include some of these functions and techniques. Andrew McAfee slate used acronym to refer to them
How does it work?
Client-side/web browser technology commonly used in Web 2.0 development Asynchronous JavaScript and XML (Ajax), Adobe Flash and JavaScript / Ajax frameworks such as Yahoo! UI Library, Dojo, MooTools, and jQuery. Ajax programming with JavaScript to upload and download new data from a Web server without having to go through the whole page to reload.
The data are taken from the Ajax request is usually in XML and JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) format, which uses two formats for structured data. Since both of these formats were originally mean JavaScript, the programmer can easily be used to send structured data in your web application. If the data received via Ajax, how the program using JavaScript, Document Object Model (DOM) to dynamically update web pages are based on new data, which allows fast and interactive user experience.
Adobe Flash technology is often used in Web 2.0 applications. As a public program notwithstanding the W3C (World Web Consortium, the managing body for web standards and protocols), standards, Flash is able to do many things not possible in HTML, the language used to create Web pages. Flash options, often used in Web 2.0 is its ability to play audio and video files. This fact alone enabled the creation of cutting edge Web 2.0 websites like YouTube, which is elegantly integrated with rich media standard HTML.
In addition to Flash and Ajax, JavaScript / Ajax frameworks recently very popular tool for creating Web pages 2.0. His core, these images do not use technology different from JavaScript, Ajax, and DOM. What limits do is hide the differences between the browser and extend the functionality available to developers. Many of them also come with customizable, prefabricated "things" as normal tasks such as data collection calendar, which displays the data graph, in the bookmarks panel, etc.
On the server side, Web 2.0 used by many of the same technologies as Web 1.0. Languages such as PHP, Ruby, Perl, Python, ASP, and is used by developers of dynamic production data using information from files and databases. What is starting to change in Web 2.0 is so that data is formatted. In the early days of the Internet, there was little need for different sites to communicate with each other and share data. The new 'participatory web', but the sharing of data between different locations were an important feature. To share your data with other sites, sites should be able to generate output in machine-readable formats like XML, RSS, and JSON. When the data are available in one of these formats, various Web sites used to integrate the functionality of the site itself, tie two together. With this design pattern, leading eventually to the data that is both easier to find and thoroughly categories hallmark philosophy of Web 2.0 movement.
Use
The popularity of the concept of Web 2.0, along with the growing use of blogs, wikis and social networking technologies, has led many in academia and industry stream of coins 2.0s [20], including Library 2.0 [21] Social Studies 2.0 [22] 2.0 Enterprise 2.0 PR, [23] Classroom 2.0, Publishing 2.0, Medicine 2.0, Travel 2.0 and Government 2.0. [24] Many of these 2.0s refer to Web 2.0 technologies as a source of new versions in their fields and areas. For example, in the Talis White Paper Library 2.0: The Challenge of revolutionary innovation ", says Paul Miller
Blogs, wikis and RSS are often held as exemplary manifestations of Web 2.0. Readers blog or wiki is in a position to add a comment, or, in the case of wikis, editing content. That is what we call the Read / Write web.Talis believes that Library 2.0 is using this type of participation so that libraries can use more extensive cooperative projects cataloging efforts, which include contributions from the partner libraries and add rich enhancements, such as The book jackets or movie files to records from publishers and others.
Here Miller links Web 2.0, technology and culture of the children growing up in the library, and supports his claim that it is now "Library 2.0". Many of the other supporters of the new 2.0s herein are using similar methods.
According to Global Language Monitor, Web 2.0, is one millionth word in the English language.
Web-based applications and
Ajax has stimulated the development of web sites that mimic desktop applications such as word processing, spreadsheet and slide-show presentation. WYSIWYG wiki sites replicate many features of PC copyright applications. Yet another site to perform the functions for collaboration and project management. In 2006, Google Inc. bought one of the most famous places in this broad class, Writely.
Several browser-based "operating systems" have emerged, including eyeOS and YouOS. Although educated as such, and many of these services works like a traditional operating system, and more as an application platform. They mimic the user experience of desktop operating systems that offer similar features and applications for the PC environment, as well as an additional option that can work in any modern browser. However, these operating systems do not control the hardware on the client computer.
Numerous on-line services, applications have emerged during the dot-com bubble in 1997-2001 and then disappeared after failed to get a critical mass of customers. In 2005, WebEx acquired one of the better known of them, Intranets.com, for 45 million U.S. dollars.
XML and RSS
Advocates of "Web 2.0" may consider syndicating the content of Web 2.0 features, which includes how it does standardized protocols that allow end users to use specific data in a different context (for example, other sites, browsers, or a separate desktop application). Protocols that enable the syndication include RSS (Really Simple Syndication - also known as "web syndication"), RDF (as in RSS 1.1) and Atom, all XML-based formats. Observers began to refer to these technologies as "Web feed" as the application of Web 2.0 and develop a more user-friendly Feeds icon supplants RSS icon.
Specialized protocols
Specialized protocols such as FOAF and XFN (both for social networking) extend the functionality in place, or allow end users to interact without centralized websites.
Other protocols such as XMPP provides services to users, who through the Messenger Service.
Web API
Machine-based interaction, a common feature of Web 2.0 sites using two main approaches to Web APIs, which allow Web-based access to data and functions: REST and SOAP.
1st REST (representational state transfer) Web API to use HTTP only to interact with XML (eXtensible Markup Language) or JSON payload;
2nd SOAP involves posting of sophisticated XML messages and requests to the server that may contain quite complex, but pre-defined, follow the instructions for your server.
Often servers use proprietary APIs, but standard API (for example, add a blog or blog update notification), was also widely used. Most of the communication through the API include XML or JSON load.
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) is a standard way to publish SOAP API, and there are many Web services specifications.
Criticism
Reviews found as "Web 2.0" is not a new version of the World Wide Web at all, but only continue to use the so-called "Web 1.0" technologies and concepts. Techniques such as AJAX do not replace the basic protocols like HTTP, but add another layer of abstraction over them. Many ideas of Web 2.0 already featured in implementations of network systems long before the term "Web 2.0" appeared. Amazon.com, for example, allow users to write reviews and consumer guides since its founding in 1995, in the form of self-publishing. Amazon also opened its API to external developers in 2002. [31] Previous developments also came from research in the field of computer-supported collaborative learning and computer-supported collaboration and from established products such as Lotus Notes and Lotus Domino.
In the podcast interview described Tim Berners-Lee term "Web 2.0" as "a piece of jargon":
Other criticisms included the term "next bubble" (referring to the dot-com bubble around 1995-2001), suggesting that too many Web 2.0 companies are trying to develop a single product with the lack of business models. The Economist wrote about "Bubble 2.0". [32] venture capitalist Josh Kopelman noted that Web 2.0 was happy just 53,651 people (the number of subscribers at that time on TechCrunch, Weblog covering Web 2.0 start-ups and technology news), too few users to be economically viable target for consumer applications . [33] Although Bruce Sterling reports that Web 2.0 is a fan believes that it is now dead as a unifying concept.
Critics refer to the language used to describe the discharge cycle of Web 2.0 as an example of techno-utopian rhetoric.
Critics such as Andrew Keen argues that Web 2.0 has created a cult of amateurism digital narcissism that undermines the notion of competence, by anyone, anywhere, share (and unnecessary to value) own views on any topic, and add some form of content regardless of the specific a talent, knowledge, skills, credentials, bias or hidden agenda perhaps. He says that the basic prerequisite for Web 2.0, that all views and user-generated content is as valuable and relevant to understand it, and instead is "creating an endless digital forest of mediocrity: uninformed political commentary, inappropriate home videos, embarrassingly amateur music, unreadable poems , essays and novels, also says that Wikipedia is full of "mistakes, half-truths and misunderstandings"
Trademarks
In November 2004, CMP Media applied to the USPTO for a service note for the use of the term "Web 2.0" for live events. On the basis of this application, CMP Media sent a cease-and-stop pressure on the Irish not-for-profit organization IT @ Cork 24 May 2006, but withdrew two days later. "Web 2.0" trademark registration passed final PTO testing Attorney review May 10, 2006 and was registered on 27 June 2006. EU-application (application number 004972212, which would clearly confer status in Ireland) is currently , while waiting for his hand-23 March 2006.
http://www.wwworldwidewebdesigner.com
"Web 2.0" is often associated with web development and web design that allows for interactive information sharing, interoperability, user-center design and collaboration on the World Wide Web. Examples of Web 2.0 include on-line communities, hosted services, web applications, social networks, video-sharing sites, wikis, blogs, mashups and folksonomies. Web 2.0 site allows its users to communicate with other users, or to change the content of Web sites, unlike non-interactive website on which users are just passive viewing of the information provided to them.
The term is closely connected with Tim O'Reilly because O'Reilly Media Web 2.0 conference in 2004. Although the term suggests a new version of the World Wide Web, but does not refer to an update to any technical specifications, but the cumulative changes in the way developers and end users use the web. Whether Web 2.0, is qualitatively different from previous Web technologies has been challenged by World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee, who called the term "piece of jargon"
History
The term "Web 2.0" was created by Darcy DiNucci in 1999. In his article "Fragmented Future," writes
This network now know that loads the browser window, essentially static screenfuls is the only seed to lose on the internet. The first glimmerings from the perspective of Web 2.0 come, and we are just starting as an embryo can not develop the Web be considered not as screenfuls text and graphics, but as a transport mechanism, ether, which takes place interactivity.
Her use of the term is mainly concerned with web design and aesthetics, she argues that the web is "fragmented" due to the widespread use of portable devices, Web-ready. The article is aimed at designers, and reminds them that the code for a growing range of hardware. As such, its use of the word suggests - but not directly - the current use of the term.
The term does not resurface until 2003. These authors focus on concepts that are related to the concept, which, as Scott Dietz says: "The Internet is a universal standard on-integration platform.
In 2004 began a period of rising popularity, when O'Reilly Media and Media Live is the first Web 2.0 conference. In his opening speech outlining John Batelle and Tim O'Reilly, the definition of "Web as Platform," where software is built on the site, as opposed to the desktop. A unique aspect of this migration, claimed that "customers build your business for you." They argued that the business users create content (in the form of ideas, text, video or images), could be "used" to create value. According to Tim O'Reilly:
Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the shift to the Internet as a platform and attempt to understand the rules for success on the new platform.
From there the term Web 2.0, largely supported by technology bloggers and journalists, which culminated in the 2006 TIME magazine Person of the Year - "You." TIME is selected by the masses of users who participated in creating content on social networks, blogs, wikis, and media sharing sites. Cover story writer Lev Grossman explains:
It is a story about community and cooperation at the level never seen before. It's about the cosmic compendium of knowledge Wikipedia and the million-channel people's network YouTube and MySpace online metropolis. It's a lot to wrest power from the few and helping one another for nothing and not only how it will change the world, but also change the way the world is changing.
Features
Flickr, Web 2.0 site that allows users to upload and share photos
Web 2.0 websites allow users to do more than just receive information. Can build on the interactive installation "Web 1.0" to provide "Network as platform" computing, allowing users to run software-applications entirely through a browser. Users can own data in a Web 2.0 site and exercise control over the data. These web sites may be "architecture of participation" that encourages users to add value to the program to be employed. This is in contrast to traditional web pages, ordering limited visitors to viewing and whose content only the site owner can change. Web 2.0 sites are often rich and user-friendly interface based on Ajax and similar frames, client-side interactivity, or full client-server application frameworks, such as OpenLaszlo, Flex, and ZK framework .
The concept of Web-as-participation-platform captures many of these characteristics. Decreti Bart, founder and former CEO of Flock, calls Web 2.0 "participatory Web" , and for the web-as-information-source as Web 1.0.
The impossibility of excluding group-members who contribute to the provision of goods from sharing profits gives rise to the possibility that rational members prefer to withhold their contribution of effort and free-ride on the contributions of others. [15] This requires a so-called radical leadership Trust Web site. According to Best, [16] that characterize Web 2.0 are: rich user experience, user participation, dynamic content, metadata, web standards and scalability. Other features, such as openness, freedom and collective intelligence [18], through interaction with the user, can be viewed as essential attributes of Web 2.0.
Technology overview
Web 2.0 combines the skills and client-server-side software, content syndication and the use of network protocols. Standards-orienterte nettlesere kan bruk og Programvare plugins utvidelser for å håndtere innholdet og brukerinteraksjon. Web 2.0 sites provide users with information storage, creation and expansion of capacity, which could not be in the village now known as "Web 1.0".
Web 2.0 websites typically include some of these functions and techniques. Andrew McAfee slate used acronym to refer to them
How does it work?
Client-side/web browser technology commonly used in Web 2.0 development Asynchronous JavaScript and XML (Ajax), Adobe Flash and JavaScript / Ajax frameworks such as Yahoo! UI Library, Dojo, MooTools, and jQuery. Ajax programming with JavaScript to upload and download new data from a Web server without having to go through the whole page to reload.
The data are taken from the Ajax request is usually in XML and JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) format, which uses two formats for structured data. Since both of these formats were originally mean JavaScript, the programmer can easily be used to send structured data in your web application. If the data received via Ajax, how the program using JavaScript, Document Object Model (DOM) to dynamically update web pages are based on new data, which allows fast and interactive user experience.
Adobe Flash technology is often used in Web 2.0 applications. As a public program notwithstanding the W3C (World Web Consortium, the managing body for web standards and protocols), standards, Flash is able to do many things not possible in HTML, the language used to create Web pages. Flash options, often used in Web 2.0 is its ability to play audio and video files. This fact alone enabled the creation of cutting edge Web 2.0 websites like YouTube, which is elegantly integrated with rich media standard HTML.
In addition to Flash and Ajax, JavaScript / Ajax frameworks recently very popular tool for creating Web pages 2.0. His core, these images do not use technology different from JavaScript, Ajax, and DOM. What limits do is hide the differences between the browser and extend the functionality available to developers. Many of them also come with customizable, prefabricated "things" as normal tasks such as data collection calendar, which displays the data graph, in the bookmarks panel, etc.
On the server side, Web 2.0 used by many of the same technologies as Web 1.0. Languages such as PHP, Ruby, Perl, Python, ASP, and is used by developers of dynamic production data using information from files and databases. What is starting to change in Web 2.0 is so that data is formatted. In the early days of the Internet, there was little need for different sites to communicate with each other and share data. The new 'participatory web', but the sharing of data between different locations were an important feature. To share your data with other sites, sites should be able to generate output in machine-readable formats like XML, RSS, and JSON. When the data are available in one of these formats, various Web sites used to integrate the functionality of the site itself, tie two together. With this design pattern, leading eventually to the data that is both easier to find and thoroughly categories hallmark philosophy of Web 2.0 movement.
Use
The popularity of the concept of Web 2.0, along with the growing use of blogs, wikis and social networking technologies, has led many in academia and industry stream of coins 2.0s [20], including Library 2.0 [21] Social Studies 2.0 [22] 2.0 Enterprise 2.0 PR, [23] Classroom 2.0, Publishing 2.0, Medicine 2.0, Travel 2.0 and Government 2.0. [24] Many of these 2.0s refer to Web 2.0 technologies as a source of new versions in their fields and areas. For example, in the Talis White Paper Library 2.0: The Challenge of revolutionary innovation ", says Paul Miller
Blogs, wikis and RSS are often held as exemplary manifestations of Web 2.0. Readers blog or wiki is in a position to add a comment, or, in the case of wikis, editing content. That is what we call the Read / Write web.Talis believes that Library 2.0 is using this type of participation so that libraries can use more extensive cooperative projects cataloging efforts, which include contributions from the partner libraries and add rich enhancements, such as The book jackets or movie files to records from publishers and others.
Here Miller links Web 2.0, technology and culture of the children growing up in the library, and supports his claim that it is now "Library 2.0". Many of the other supporters of the new 2.0s herein are using similar methods.
According to Global Language Monitor, Web 2.0, is one millionth word in the English language.
Web-based applications and
Ajax has stimulated the development of web sites that mimic desktop applications such as word processing, spreadsheet and slide-show presentation. WYSIWYG wiki sites replicate many features of PC copyright applications. Yet another site to perform the functions for collaboration and project management. In 2006, Google Inc. bought one of the most famous places in this broad class, Writely.
Several browser-based "operating systems" have emerged, including eyeOS and YouOS. Although educated as such, and many of these services works like a traditional operating system, and more as an application platform. They mimic the user experience of desktop operating systems that offer similar features and applications for the PC environment, as well as an additional option that can work in any modern browser. However, these operating systems do not control the hardware on the client computer.
Numerous on-line services, applications have emerged during the dot-com bubble in 1997-2001 and then disappeared after failed to get a critical mass of customers. In 2005, WebEx acquired one of the better known of them, Intranets.com, for 45 million U.S. dollars.
XML and RSS
Advocates of "Web 2.0" may consider syndicating the content of Web 2.0 features, which includes how it does standardized protocols that allow end users to use specific data in a different context (for example, other sites, browsers, or a separate desktop application). Protocols that enable the syndication include RSS (Really Simple Syndication - also known as "web syndication"), RDF (as in RSS 1.1) and Atom, all XML-based formats. Observers began to refer to these technologies as "Web feed" as the application of Web 2.0 and develop a more user-friendly Feeds icon supplants RSS icon.
Specialized protocols
Specialized protocols such as FOAF and XFN (both for social networking) extend the functionality in place, or allow end users to interact without centralized websites.
Other protocols such as XMPP provides services to users, who through the Messenger Service.
Web API
Machine-based interaction, a common feature of Web 2.0 sites using two main approaches to Web APIs, which allow Web-based access to data and functions: REST and SOAP.
1st REST (representational state transfer) Web API to use HTTP only to interact with XML (eXtensible Markup Language) or JSON payload;
2nd SOAP involves posting of sophisticated XML messages and requests to the server that may contain quite complex, but pre-defined, follow the instructions for your server.
Often servers use proprietary APIs, but standard API (for example, add a blog or blog update notification), was also widely used. Most of the communication through the API include XML or JSON load.
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) is a standard way to publish SOAP API, and there are many Web services specifications.
Criticism
Reviews found as "Web 2.0" is not a new version of the World Wide Web at all, but only continue to use the so-called "Web 1.0" technologies and concepts. Techniques such as AJAX do not replace the basic protocols like HTTP, but add another layer of abstraction over them. Many ideas of Web 2.0 already featured in implementations of network systems long before the term "Web 2.0" appeared. Amazon.com, for example, allow users to write reviews and consumer guides since its founding in 1995, in the form of self-publishing. Amazon also opened its API to external developers in 2002. [31] Previous developments also came from research in the field of computer-supported collaborative learning and computer-supported collaboration and from established products such as Lotus Notes and Lotus Domino.
In the podcast interview described Tim Berners-Lee term "Web 2.0" as "a piece of jargon":
Other criticisms included the term "next bubble" (referring to the dot-com bubble around 1995-2001), suggesting that too many Web 2.0 companies are trying to develop a single product with the lack of business models. The Economist wrote about "Bubble 2.0". [32] venture capitalist Josh Kopelman noted that Web 2.0 was happy just 53,651 people (the number of subscribers at that time on TechCrunch, Weblog covering Web 2.0 start-ups and technology news), too few users to be economically viable target for consumer applications . [33] Although Bruce Sterling reports that Web 2.0 is a fan believes that it is now dead as a unifying concept.
Critics refer to the language used to describe the discharge cycle of Web 2.0 as an example of techno-utopian rhetoric.
Critics such as Andrew Keen argues that Web 2.0 has created a cult of amateurism digital narcissism that undermines the notion of competence, by anyone, anywhere, share (and unnecessary to value) own views on any topic, and add some form of content regardless of the specific a talent, knowledge, skills, credentials, bias or hidden agenda perhaps. He says that the basic prerequisite for Web 2.0, that all views and user-generated content is as valuable and relevant to understand it, and instead is "creating an endless digital forest of mediocrity: uninformed political commentary, inappropriate home videos, embarrassingly amateur music, unreadable poems , essays and novels, also says that Wikipedia is full of "mistakes, half-truths and misunderstandings"
Trademarks
In November 2004, CMP Media applied to the USPTO for a service note for the use of the term "Web 2.0" for live events. On the basis of this application, CMP Media sent a cease-and-stop pressure on the Irish not-for-profit organization IT @ Cork 24 May 2006, but withdrew two days later. "Web 2.0" trademark registration passed final PTO testing Attorney review May 10, 2006 and was registered on 27 June 2006. EU-application (application number 004972212, which would clearly confer status in Ireland) is currently , while waiting for his hand-23 March 2006.
http://www.wwworldwidewebdesigner.com
about web 2.0
berners lee web 2.0
best web 2.0
black web 2.0
blue web 2.0
cool web 2.0
download web 2.0
features of web 2.0
free web 2.0
future of web 2.0
go to web 2.0
go web 2.0
good web 2.0
google web 2.0
government web 2.0
great web 2.0
how to web 2.0
ibm web 2.0
internet web 2.0
latest web 2.0
learn web 2.0
list of web 2.0
microsoft web 2.0
mobile web 2.0
new web 2.0
o'reilly web 2.0
simple web 2.0
techcrunch
the web 2.0
tim o'reilly web 2.0
top 10 web 2.0
top web 2.0
uk web 2.0
understanding web 2.0
web 2.0
web 2.0 advantages
web 2.0 app
web 2.0 application
web 2.0 applications
web 2.0 apps
web 2.0 article
web 2.0 awards
web 2.0 banner
web 2.0 blogs
web 2.0 books
web 2.0 box
web 2.0 browser
web 2.0 business
web 2.0 business models
web 2.0 color
web 2.0 colors
web 2.0 colour
web 2.0 colours
web 2.0 community
web 2.0 companies
web 2.0 company
web 2.0 concepts
web 2.0 conference
web 2.0 content
web 2.0 course
web 2.0 data
web 2.0 database
web 2.0 definition
web 2.0 definitions
web 2.0 developer
web 2.0 developers
web 2.0 development
web 2.0 directory
web 2.0 education
web 2.0 email
web 2.0 event
web 2.0 explained
web 2.0 expo
web 2.0 features
web 2.0 finance
web 2.0 flash
web 2.0 form
web 2.0 forms
web 2.0 forum
web 2.0 forums
web 2.0 functionality
web 2.0 gallery
web 2.0 generation
web 2.0 graphic
web 2.0 green
web 2.0 help
web 2.0 history
web 2.0 icon
web 2.0 ideas
web 2.0 image
web 2.0 images
web 2.0 impact
web 2.0 in business
web 2.0 information
web 2.0 interface
web 2.0 is
web 2.0 job
web 2.0 list
web 2.0 loading
web 2.0 login
web 2.0 logos
web 2.0 look
web 2.0 map
web 2.0 marketing
web 2.0 media
web 2.0 menu
web 2.0 music
web 2.0 name
web 2.0 navigation bar
web 2.0 o
web 2.0 pages
web 2.0 pdf
web 2.0 photo
web 2.0 portal
web 2.0 ppt
web 2.0 presentation
web 2.0 projects
web 2.0 report
web 2.0 research
web 2.0 resources
web 2.0 review
web 2.0 scripts
web 2.0 search
web 2.0 services
web 2.0 show
web 2.0 site
web 2.0 sites
web 2.0 software
web 2.0 table
web 2.0 tag
web 2.0 tags
web 2.0 techniques
web 2.0 technologies
web 2.0 technology
web 2.0 tool
web 2.0 tools
web 2.0 traffic
web 2.0 training
web 2.0 twitter
web 2.0 video
web 2.0 website
web 2.0 websites
web 2.0 what is it
web 2.0 wikipedia
web 2.0 words
web 2.0 world
web 3.0
web20
what is web 2.0
what web 2.0
why web 2.0
youtube web 2.0
berners lee web 2.0
best web 2.0
black web 2.0
blue web 2.0
cool web 2.0
download web 2.0
features of web 2.0
free web 2.0
future of web 2.0
go to web 2.0
go web 2.0
good web 2.0
google web 2.0
government web 2.0
great web 2.0
how to web 2.0
ibm web 2.0
internet web 2.0
latest web 2.0
learn web 2.0
list of web 2.0
microsoft web 2.0
mobile web 2.0
new web 2.0
o'reilly web 2.0
simple web 2.0
techcrunch
the web 2.0
tim o'reilly web 2.0
top 10 web 2.0
top web 2.0
uk web 2.0
understanding web 2.0
web 2.0
web 2.0 advantages
web 2.0 app
web 2.0 application
web 2.0 applications
web 2.0 apps
web 2.0 article
web 2.0 awards
web 2.0 banner
web 2.0 blogs
web 2.0 books
web 2.0 box
web 2.0 browser
web 2.0 business
web 2.0 business models
web 2.0 color
web 2.0 colors
web 2.0 colour
web 2.0 colours
web 2.0 community
web 2.0 companies
web 2.0 company
web 2.0 concepts
web 2.0 conference
web 2.0 content
web 2.0 course
web 2.0 data
web 2.0 database
web 2.0 definition
web 2.0 definitions
web 2.0 developer
web 2.0 developers
web 2.0 development
web 2.0 directory
web 2.0 education
web 2.0 email
web 2.0 event
web 2.0 explained
web 2.0 expo
web 2.0 features
web 2.0 finance
web 2.0 flash
web 2.0 form
web 2.0 forms
web 2.0 forum
web 2.0 forums
web 2.0 functionality
web 2.0 gallery
web 2.0 generation
web 2.0 graphic
web 2.0 green
web 2.0 help
web 2.0 history
web 2.0 icon
web 2.0 ideas
web 2.0 image
web 2.0 images
web 2.0 impact
web 2.0 in business
web 2.0 information
web 2.0 interface
web 2.0 is
web 2.0 job
web 2.0 list
web 2.0 loading
web 2.0 login
web 2.0 logos
web 2.0 look
web 2.0 map
web 2.0 marketing
web 2.0 media
web 2.0 menu
web 2.0 music
web 2.0 name
web 2.0 navigation bar
web 2.0 o
web 2.0 pages
web 2.0 pdf
web 2.0 photo
web 2.0 portal
web 2.0 ppt
web 2.0 presentation
web 2.0 projects
web 2.0 report
web 2.0 research
web 2.0 resources
web 2.0 review
web 2.0 scripts
web 2.0 search
web 2.0 services
web 2.0 show
web 2.0 site
web 2.0 sites
web 2.0 software
web 2.0 table
web 2.0 tag
web 2.0 tags
web 2.0 techniques
web 2.0 technologies
web 2.0 technology
web 2.0 tool
web 2.0 tools
web 2.0 traffic
web 2.0 training
web 2.0 twitter
web 2.0 video
web 2.0 website
web 2.0 websites
web 2.0 what is it
web 2.0 wikipedia
web 2.0 words
web 2.0 world
web 3.0
web20
what is web 2.0
what web 2.0
why web 2.0
youtube web 2.0
